Register-backed
Incorporation, size band, directors and filing history come from Companies House and the French national register. Not from their marketing.
Written teardowns of the companies you lose to, built on official register data. Every claim marked verified or inferred, so you know what is fact and what is my judgement.
Incorporation, size band, directors and filing history come from Companies House and the French national register. Not from their marketing.
Every statement is labelled. You can act on the verified ones and weigh the rest yourself.
A single competitor teardown lands in three working days, not three weeks.
Four steps, and you see the output before you commit to anything further.
The one you keep losing to, or the one you cannot read. One name is enough to start.
Incorporation date, accounts band, directors, filing history. The parts that cannot be spun.
Pricing, positioning, who they target, how they acquire, and how recently they updated any of it.
Their weaknesses, the gaps you can attack, and where you should sit relative to them.
Fixed fees, stated up front.
One competitor, fully mapped: services, published pricing, ICP, acquisition channels, reputation and weaknesses. Every claim marked verified or inferred. Three working days.
Five to eight competitors on the same axes, a pricing landscape, the positions nobody currently owns, and a recommendation on where you should sit. Seven working days.
Monthly watch on your competitive set: pricing changes, new positioning, hiring patterns, filing activity. You get told when something moves rather than finding out from a lost deal.
Official registers, the companies' own websites and published sources. I do not use anything obtained improperly, and I tell you the source of every claim.
Verified means I can point at a filing or a page on their site. Inferred means I reasoned from evidence and could be wrong. Both are useful; conflating them is not.
In France, often yes, because turnover is published. In the UK, usually only a size band from the accounts they file. I will not invent a figure to fill the gap.
Yes. Everything used is public, and much of it is published by law. This is desk research, not anything covert.
That is itself a finding, and I will say so rather than padding the report. If a competitor is genuinely opaque, knowing that is worth something.
Tell me roughly what you are dealing with and I will reply with a straight answer about whether I can help.